Why is Donald Trump withholding the JFK files?
Trump talked about releasing the JFK-files but all he keeps releasing are more censored versions. Why?
One hot promise for Trump’s election was to release the JFK files in full. This has not occurred. Instead, we got a censored version where several names have been withheld.
In the 2016 election, Donald Trump’s foremost promise, besides the wall, was to release the full and uncensored JFK investigation. For those of you who have not been familiarized with the investigation, the JFK murder investigation was bizarre from the outset. For example, when John F Kennedy´s body arrived at the Bethesda Naval Hospital in Maryland. The autopsy was supervised by the military, and the doctors reported having been treated in a demeaning fashion and also in a directly threatening manner.
According to an expert on the JFK-assassination, JFK Files journalist and former Washington Post reporter Jefferson Morley said there are further documents in the National Archives yet to be released, and others held by the CIA and FBI that have not yet been accounted for.
Afterwards, Lyndon B Johnson took over as president in what the famous Louisiana state prosecutor Jim Garisson meant was a silent coup d´etat!
Jim Garisson
There are a lot of theories about whether or not many of these are valid theories or just conspiracy theories, which have no real merit.
But one thing is certain, and that is that Lee Harvey Oswald wasn´t the only shooter and probably did not shoot at all.
The FBI tested to shoot a moving target from that distance and with that accuracy, and despite not being in the stressful situation, like Oswald was proposed to have been, none of the FBI personnel could hit that target with that precision, or even coming close!
The conclusion was that for the shooter to have been successful, he or she must have been one of the 10 best shooters in the whole world!
Oswald was a former Marine Corps soldier, but he was not a professional sniper.
So the whole idea that he was a patsy is very appealing, especially when he had a military background. Just claiming a person with no experience in guns whatsoever would shoot that impossible shot and succeed, would have been too absurd to claim, even in a poorly done cover-up like this.
And it was poorly done indeed…
Lee directly yelled to the cops that he was a patsy. He was also shot by a shooter called Jack Rubenstein, who was a former nightclub owner who suffered from terminal cancer. The official reason why he shot JFK was never established, but he at least claimed that he did not want the Jews to be blamed for the assassination, which is a very weird statement. If it had been an impartial trial, the guilt would have been established where it lay, and if they were innocent, that would also have been established.
Oswalds murder caught on camera, weirdly in perfect time, like the photographer knew…
I am not going to put words in anyone’s mouth. But who really benefited from there not being a trial in the first place?
Also, the death of Oswald at the hands of Rubenstein was bizarre.. The police did not even seem to care to protect Oswald, who was a high-profile target, at least as hated as (probably more) hated than Anders Behring Breivik in Norway. Like Jim Garisson put it: “He was led like a lamb to the slaughter!”
The man who put forward the theory of a big conspiracy was named Jim Garisson, as I mentioned before in this text. He believed that former CIA agents planned and executed it, with the help of the military and by the will of the military-industrial complex.
John F Kennedy himself was not a pacifist, far from it. But he realized the harm of big wars and wanted to work against the influence of the military-industrial complex and the CIA. He said that he wanted to shred the CIA into “a thousand different pieces!” So he wanted to destroy the CIA and build something new.
Of course, this did not go over well with executives at the CIA.
Ultimately, Garisson’s investigation failed. But although being mocked during the investigation and the trial, time came to restore him.
If we return now to Trump. The uncensored files have not been released. Instead, we only got the same documents as before, with a little less censored names. Trumps official reasoning for this is that if he releases it all, it would cause problems for affected people.
Which people would be affected after an almost 62-year-old murder? Vampires?
So you hear that the justification is bogus, and it was bogus in 2016 when he first let down his promise of releasing the JFK files back then. Now it is utter nonsense..
So we have to ask who or what he is protecting?
You cannot drain the swamp without releasing the files that show which people created the swamp in the first place!
I hope I am wrong, but I strongly suspect that I will never see any real and truly unedited documents during my lifetime.
I would also like to take the opportunity to promote an interview the Newspaper(which I work for), Newsvoice, did with the mistress and friend of Lee Harvey Oswald: Judith Vary Baker:
Sources:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly676jp291o
https://www.americanheritage.com/why-did-ruby-kill-oswald
Good article, and thanks for embedding my interview with Vary Baker, who claims Oswald was a Navy Seal who was tasked to spy on Russia and Cuba, and at the end of his life was used by the CIA to kill Kennedy, whom he admired. It's an unfortunate story, but it highlights the cruelty inherent in some international affairs.
The interview with Baker starts at 3 minutes and 20 seconds:
https://youtu.be/EZD8qicWE4U?si=shMk7LGMwQLcA5xG&t=210